citymancs

citymancs => citymancs => Topic started by: Swiss on March 11, 2017, 11:44:14

Title: City v boro
Post by: Swiss on March 11, 2017, 11:44:14
Looks as though we've gone for a strong attacking line up!

City XI: Bravo, Zabaleta (C), Sterling, Agüero , De Bruyne,  Sané, Silva, Clichy, Stones, Otamendi, Toure

Subs: Caballero, Fernando, Nolito, Kolarov, Delph, Fernandinho, Iheanacho
Title: Re: City v boro
Post by: gavin on March 11, 2017, 12:05:52
Very strong side. Could be said it is the side that should have played in midweek. Come on City.
Title: Re: City v boro
Post by: KunDB on March 11, 2017, 12:16:50
Except Bravo
Title: Re: City v boro
Post by: Gareth on March 11, 2017, 12:19:37
Ok, 1-0, now let's make sure...
Title: Re: City v boro
Post by: KunDB on March 11, 2017, 12:20:18
Sublime Yaya pass and superb goal
Title: Re: City v boro
Post by: Rowley Birkin QC on March 11, 2017, 12:25:04
I see the cynical fouling has begun early....
Title: Re: City v boro
Post by: Rowley Birkin QC on March 11, 2017, 12:40:05
Bravo saved something! (With a bit of help from Zab)
Title: Re: City v boro
Post by: Rowley Birkin QC on March 11, 2017, 12:42:52
Uh oh.. here comes the Beast.
Title: Re: City v boro
Post by: Rowley Birkin QC on March 11, 2017, 13:15:10
I'm not surprised no one has much to say at half time. That was dog shit.
Title: Re: City v boro
Post by: KunDB on March 11, 2017, 13:16:42
Quote from: Rowley Birkin QC on March 11, 2017, 12:40:05
Bravo saved something! (With a bit of help from Zab)

Put another way Bravo fails to save a shot yet again.
Title: Re: City v boro
Post by: KunDB on March 11, 2017, 13:17:48
Stones has been good which makes me wonder whatever happened to Lee.
Title: Re: City v boro
Post by: Rowley Birkin QC on March 11, 2017, 13:20:59
Quote from: Zabba on March 11, 2017, 13:16:42
Put another way Bravo fails to save a shot yet again.

Err... that was kinda my point! He did manage one proper save after that.
Title: Re: City v boro
Post by: gavin on March 11, 2017, 13:21:26
Sometimes it is like we don't want to score those chances. The lads just don't seem to make the commitment to get on the end of things.
Title: Re: City v boro
Post by: Rowley Birkin QC on March 11, 2017, 13:25:35
It's all way too casual.
Title: Re: City v boro
Post by: gavin on March 11, 2017, 13:27:38
It is fucking ridiculous the chances we miss. Shocking.
Title: Re: City v boro
Post by: Rowley Birkin QC on March 11, 2017, 13:42:51
Finally. How long did that fucking take.
Title: Re: City v boro
Post by: gavin on March 11, 2017, 13:43:33
Hallelujah
Title: Re: City v boro
Post by: KunDB on March 11, 2017, 13:53:44
In 60 years supporting City I cannot recall a City goalie as poor as Bravo.
Title: Re: City v boro
Post by: gavin on March 11, 2017, 14:10:27
Nice, comfortable win in the end. On to Wembley.
Title: Re: City v boro
Post by: Rowley Birkin QC on March 11, 2017, 14:15:08
How many freak'in shots on goal did we have!?
Title: Re: City v boro
Post by: Ludo on March 11, 2017, 16:08:20
We really need to be more clinical in front of goal.

With all Silva's ability he really shouldn't be so poor on his right foot and the same could be said for Sane.
Title: Re: City v boro
Post by: goat on March 11, 2017, 17:15:01
so unlike the city strikers i didnt miss anything eh
Title: Re: City v boro
Post by: Neil Mcnab on March 11, 2017, 21:43:52
Decent result, boro gave it a go, but not all out. Sane may have faults, but is already looking like he could be a galactico, though a Citeh version, not a Madrid one.  At 21 he has many years to improve.
Title: Re: City v boro
Post by: Rowley Birkin QC on March 11, 2017, 22:29:37
Pah! I always want revenge for all those 1990's defeats and embarrassments! I wanted us to hand them their arses back on a silver platter! Even more so when some of those Boro 'tackles' started flying in.

That should have been 6 or 7 - 0. Both Sane and Silva could have had hat tricks - and Sterling should have got at least one.
Title: Re: City v boro
Post by: lee on March 14, 2017, 07:59:57
Quote from: Zabba on March 11, 2017, 13:17:48
Stones has been good which makes me wonder whatever happened to Lee.

im lurking :)