citymancs

citymancs => citymancs => Topic started by: KunDB on January 20, 2019, 12:33:28

Title: City @ Terriers Match Thread
Post by: KunDB on January 20, 2019, 12:33:28
City XI | Ederson, Walker, Danilo, Otamendi, Laporte, Fernandinho (C), Gundogan, De Bruyne, Sane, Sterling, Aguero

Subs | Muric, Stones, Delph, Bernardo, Silva, Jesus, Foden

No Silva?

C'mon City lets keep up the impressive winning form we having had recently.
Title: Re: City @ Terriers Match Thread
Post by: Rowley Birkin QC on January 20, 2019, 12:37:50
Need to get some decent game time into De Bruyne I think. A good game to start him.
Title: Re: City @ Terriers Match Thread
Post by: gavin on January 20, 2019, 13:24:54
He does seem to be avoiding playing Dave and Kev together. Decent side though. Come on City.
Title: Re: City @ Terriers Match Thread
Post by: Rowley Birkin QC on January 20, 2019, 13:43:55
I am reminded, watching Sky's coverage down here and listening to what passes for football commentary these days (Some bloke and Andy Townsend) - that they never shut the fuck up!


And that was a dead set penalty.
Title: Re: City @ Terriers Match Thread
Post by: Rowley Birkin QC on January 20, 2019, 14:00:30
Our passing needs to improve...
Title: Re: City @ Terriers Match Thread
Post by: gavin on January 20, 2019, 14:21:29
We need to show some urgency to finish the game off. Letting it drift towards the end at 1-0 would be a big mistake. Not a great first half. But the ref was as bad as anyone. That was a stone wall penalty.
Title: Re: City @ Terriers Match Thread
Post by: KunDB on January 20, 2019, 14:22:24
Obviously a penalty to all but officials suspiciously.

Sloppiness in passing tempo and work rate. I hope Pep tears into the players at half time.
Title: Re: City @ Terriers Match Thread
Post by: gavin on January 20, 2019, 14:23:04
Yes, passing had been poor. Disappointed in Gundog in particular but it has been a general problem.
Title: Re: City @ Terriers Match Thread
Post by: Rowley Birkin QC on January 20, 2019, 14:26:46
Pretty poor half by our exulted standards.

Huddersfield are well organised defensively. They have Sane well marshalled, and Sterling isn't getting much more joy down the right. For most of that half only Fernandinho looked capable of unlocking them - but just before the interval there we saw a glimpse of the old Kevin De Bruyne (the pass through for Gundog). Need to see more of that second half... and better passing in general. Too many going astray / under-hit.
Title: Re: City @ Terriers Match Thread
Post by: KunDB on January 20, 2019, 14:46:17
Well done Pep 'talk'.

3 0
Title: Re: City @ Terriers Match Thread
Post by: Rowley Birkin QC on January 20, 2019, 14:46:30
And after a bit more sluggish stuff - we suddenly find our gear. Two good goals.
Title: Re: City @ Terriers Match Thread
Post by: Neil Mcnab on January 20, 2019, 15:30:52
Decent result, never hit top gear.
Title: Re: City @ Terriers Match Thread
Post by: lee on January 20, 2019, 19:02:32
nice 3 points and keeps the pressure on klopps shiney toothed lot
ref was a bellend today
Title: Re: City @ Terriers Match Thread
Post by: gavin on January 20, 2019, 20:23:52
The result is the main thing. Ten minute spell of actually bothering to try finished them off good style. But we need to play properly in the future games otherwise we could be caught out.
Title: Re: City @ Terriers Match Thread
Post by: KunDB on January 20, 2019, 21:59:04
It’s beyond me why the officials do not have to explain why they did not see nor award a stonewall penalty.

Sterling v Salah refs penalty decisions - Any excuse to say no v Any excuse to say yes.
Title: Re: City @ Terriers Match Thread
Post by: KunDB on January 21, 2019, 07:52:13
Garth Crooks BBC said:

“Andre Marriner's decision not to award Sterling a penalty was so bad it was almost villainous.

As for his assistant referee Richard West, he might as well have gone West! “

I second that.