Author Topic: navas  (Read 1737 times)

goat

  • citymanc
  • Posts: 3981
navas
« on: May 25, 2017, 15:42:35 »
fucked off

« Last Edit: May 25, 2017, 15:54:12 by goat »

Moz1959

  • citymanc
  • Posts: 128
Re: navas
« Reply #1 on: May 25, 2017, 16:53:17 »
and willy

nimrod

  • citymanc
  • Posts: 1613
Re: navas
« Reply #2 on: May 25, 2017, 16:57:21 »
There is a god

Moz1959

  • citymanc
  • Posts: 128
Re: navas
« Reply #3 on: May 25, 2017, 18:09:37 »
now sagna , summer will be interesting

KunDB

  • citymanc
  • Posts: 2771
Re: navas
« Reply #4 on: May 25, 2017, 19:23:56 »
and Caballero as well.

Ludo

  • citymanc
  • Posts: 1436
Re: navas
« Reply #5 on: May 25, 2017, 19:59:01 »
I expected Sagna, Clichy, Navas and Zabs to go but I thought Willy might've stayed and Bravo went.

stephenmcfc

  • citymanc
  • Posts: 1684
  • I.T technician
Re: navas
« Reply #6 on: May 25, 2017, 20:31:19 »
Pep getting down to business

gavin

  • Administrator
  • citymanc
  • Posts: 4136
Re: navas
« Reply #7 on: May 25, 2017, 21:02:13 »
Thought Navas might be kept as a utility man for the entire right side. But as a winger his end product wasn't good enough really. He did create but was too often wasteful and his finishing was woeful. He always put in the effort though so good luck to the guy. Same to the others, all decent lads but probably not much future in them as regular first teamers.

Interesting summer indeedy.

Swiss

  • citymanc
  • Posts: 3146
Re: navas
« Reply #8 on: May 25, 2017, 21:32:20 »
If navas goes and Sanchez comes in, that'll be excellent business

gavin

  • Administrator
  • citymanc
  • Posts: 4136
Re: navas
« Reply #9 on: May 25, 2017, 22:06:18 »
LOL, what about right back?

Swiss

  • citymanc
  • Posts: 3146
Re: navas
« Reply #10 on: May 25, 2017, 22:50:03 »
Though experimented, I don't think he was the answer both in the present or going forward.

I think like Clichy, he was a good servant, a steady eddy, but ultimately average when we needed special.

They both brought us some high moments but also frustration too.

Lekos

  • citymanc
  • Posts: 1402
Re: navas
« Reply #11 on: May 25, 2017, 22:55:55 »
fucked off

Great news.

and willy

Not so great news as that means bravo is staying  :'(

KunDB

  • citymanc
  • Posts: 2771
Re: navas
« Reply #12 on: May 25, 2017, 23:24:23 »
It is beyond me how Bravo could be staying, Pep admit you were wrong and get in a good solid goalkeeper who has good footwork skills as well. Bravo is simple a failed goalkeeper with good footwork.

If Bravo is first choice next year we can say goodbye to even a faint hope of winning trophies.

nimrod

  • citymanc
  • Posts: 1613
Re: navas
« Reply #13 on: May 26, 2017, 08:28:59 »
fucked off


That's a great song I like 70's disco some terrific bass lines

Hesperus

  • citymanc
  • Posts: 651
Re: navas
« Reply #14 on: May 26, 2017, 09:50:10 »
Bravo may come good next season. He did look a bit better in the final few games he played. I'm sure there is a decent keeper in there somewhere, we just haven't seen it yet. However I fully expect a new first choice keeper to be brought on.

I agree with all the releases. As mentioned they've all given some good performances but in general they are not at the level we need to move forward.

Victoria

  • Guest
Re: navas
« Reply #15 on: May 26, 2017, 13:45:50 »
Quote
Bravo may come good next season.

You are deluded if you think that!