City v QPR (ah memories)

[goat]

Enjoyable game and that is the main thing. There was some wonderful football played and some absolutely dreadful defending - mainly from QOR but also from City. When Sergio has a few games in him and starts reaching form there is only Messi and Tranny above him in the world.

I would only put Messi ahead of him as the fake Ronaldo is an ex-rag and a whiny moaning twot to boot.

id have the lad with the nose ahead of aguero with the other two

[bluebrendan]

Enjoyable game and that is the main thing. There was some wonderful football played and some absolutely dreadful defending - mainly from QOR but also from City. When Sergio has a few games in him and starts reaching form there is only Messi and Tranny above him in the world.

I would only put Messi ahead of him as the fake Ronaldo is an ex-rag and a whiny moaning twot to boot.

id have the lad with the nose ahead of aguero with the other two

He's past it now. 

[goat]

says the man thats past it


as an all round player he has more to his game

[nimrod]

Milner is decent, wtf are you guys on about?

some of those crosses 1st half were abysmal, he runs around a lot but devoid of real talent, we need better

would he get anywhere near a top team like Barca or Bayern - No

why play him on the wing when you have Navas on the bench?

Sorry but the engineer baffles me (and sorry I dont rate Milner)

[Lekos]

I like Milner - he gets a bad rep.  OK, he's not the most skillful player at the Club, but commitment wise I'd only put Zab and Kun above him...maybe Kompany also.

He's a fantastic utility player and should have started more games for us this season.  I'd sooner start Milner than Fernando / Nasri.

PS - We'll miss him when he's gone.

[clevblue]

PS - We'll miss him when he's gone.

Surely that depends on who comes in? We all know he's a worker but we know we need more workers in most areas. This season, Milner has sometimes been the only one trying,  or so it's seemed. He has good and bad points definitely

[nimrod]

I like Milner - he gets a bad rep.  OK, he's not the most skillful player at the Club, but commitment wise I'd only put Zab and Kun above him...maybe Kompany also.

He's a fantastic utility player and should have started more games for us this season.  I'd sooner start Milner than Fernando / Nasri.

PS - We'll miss him when he's gone.

He's a 100% er for sure

I just dont like it when he's in the team, granted though he is a decent utility player, anyway he obviously doesnt want to play for City next season ashe has refused to sign a new contract so I dont really see the commitment angle

[The Blue Blooded Maniac]

He's said he wants to stay but he needs assurance that he's going to play more games and Pele can't give him that.

[goat]

of course he wants to stay, nobody else is going to pay him what city does

[nimrod]

He's said he wants to stay but he needs assurance that he's going to play more games and Pele can't give him that.

surely if he was committed to MCFC he would sign

no player (except maybe our best players) is assured of playing a minimum No of games, what if he loses form half way through the season, does Pelle keep his promise?

surely commitment to a club is signing and putting in the effort so the mgr cant leave you out

[alexsam]

Hasn't Milner already agreed to go to the Dippers as a replacement for Stevie G.

Him and Henderson in the middle. Its the future.

[Rowley Birkin QC]

PS - We'll miss him when he's gone.

Surely that depends on who comes in?

Trouble with that - is City don't have the best of records on that score

Remember when everyone expected us to replace De Jong "with someone better"?

[Lekos]

I like Milner - he gets a bad rep.  OK, he's not the most skillful player at the Club, but commitment wise I'd only put Zab and Kun above him...maybe Kompany also.

He's a fantastic utility player and should have started more games for us this season.  I'd sooner start Milner than Fernando / Nasri.

PS - We'll miss him when he's gone.

He's a 100% er for sure

I just dont like it when he's in the team, granted though he is a decent utility player, anyway he obviously doesnt want to play for City next season ashe has refused to sign a new contract so I dont really see the commitment angle

I mean when on the pitch.  He wants to start more games, and who can blame him.  He'll take a wage drop to play for the 'dippers, but he'll get regular games.

[Ludo]

why play him on the wing when you have Navas on the bench?

Probably because Navas is worse. He'd give a headless chicken a bad name.

[Tricky Trev]

Milner is decent, wtf are you guys on about?

some of those crosses 1st half were abysmal, he runs around a lot but devoid of real talent, we need better

would he get anywhere near a top team like Barca or Bayern - No

why play him on the wing when you have Navas on the bench?

Sorry but the engineer baffles me (and sorry I dont rate Milner)

Just like De Jong, under appreciated. And although he is not that flashy skillful player that can win a game alone, he is a very important work horse that every team needs. We can't have a team full of silva's. Real talent, what a load of horse shit.

He deserves to start more games, so leaving would be a good move.

[KunDB]

Arsenal played with real intent tonight showing how desperate they were to get second in PL. Still fell short losing to a soft Swansea goal (given by goal line technology).

Second place is now resting in our own hands again.

[nimrod]

everybody reckons Milner is underrated but everybody rates him highly

[Lekos]

I think your use of the term "everybody" is quite loose 

[Ludo]

There's no doubt City could buy a better player but there's also no doubt we're abetter team at the minute with Milner in it.